Blogroll

Web Links

Sitemeter


W3 Counter


« 2005 In Review: Buzzing The Treetops | Main | No More Einsteins? »

January 03, 2006

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c3c869e200d8349e5fc969e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Number 49:

Comments

Jeff,

I agree. Narnia was better the second time. But the things I didn't like the first time bothered me more during the second viewing. Namely, the chasing after Edmund after realizing he was gone and then turning back to the Beavers' house, the ice waterfall and the long battle sequence at the end.

I know, you must be thinking, how can you object to the long battle sequence. Well, it was elaborated so much more than in the book and it also was toned down at the same time because there was no blood to maintain the rating on the film.

In any case, I enjoyed the other aspects of the film more the second time I viewed it.

I was more critical of their depiction of Aslan when I watched the film the first time. The second time I was not as bothered.

I went the second time to enjoy the film as a movie watcher instead of a C.S. Lewis fan. I really enjoyed the musical score the second time ... and hardly noticed it during the first viewing.

I did not like the ice waterfall scene either, btw.

I loved the film but was bothered by the changes they made. Most changes were of little or no real impact on the story as Lewis told it but as I sat expecting one thing and they put up another it made me wonder if my memory was off or not. Found it distracting.

I plan on another viewing and perhaps I too will enjoy it more the second time.

Prying1

You did exactly what I did when I first watched the film. My advice is go watch it again, this time as a movie goer instead of an analyst. It is much more enjoyable.

Walden Media kept the large overall themes from the book intact. There is enough there that you can still enjoy this film for what it is.

The comments to this entry are closed.