Blogroll

Web Links

Sitemeter


W3 Counter


« "Where Does The Emerging Church Fit?" | Main | Worshipping Christ In Roanoke »

February 13, 2007

Comments

One topic I'd like to see you post on (if you have experience of it- or maybe already written upon it) is the secularization of society. From my experience of living in 5 states and almost 10 cities is that Roanoke is behind the times in terms of secularization of the cultural atmosphere. The easiest way to recognise this is travel between D.C. and Roanoke. Big Difference. The lack of a church building every half-mile or less is the first indicator.

What I noticed in Roanoke is not whether one goes to church, its a matter of which church do/did you go to? [Young adults in the area tend to cast off church for 10 years or so until they have children and think its a good idea to return.]

Is this a southern thing? Or is it a vestige of how things used to be everywhere?

The broader question could be: In which sort of town would you like to live, culturally Christian or secular? Which is better for producing sincere faithful?

A friend of mine teaches in a classical Christian school. It sounds very interesting. Can a kid jump in at any point, or do you really have to start early to get the benefit of the classical trivium?

How do they handle science education? I have to confess that my biggest hangup about traditional Christian schools is that often seem to promote a warfare thesis concerning faith and science.

re: kids jumping in late

Absolutely. One of mine jumped in as an 8th grader. She is doing fine. Yours would too, I bet.

All things being equal, it is better to start early and get those kids engaged in Latin, reading the classics, learning how to write, exposing them grammar (particularly Latin) and heavy memorization early. But late starters can shine too ... if they are determined.

re: science education

There is nothing built into classical learning that teaches kids to hate science or view it as a threat. They are taught to love science * and * why they should love science. That is the part I like. The science is integrated into life -- and discussions about metaphysics or theology are open and welcome. This makes science far more interesting that the drivel I endured in public school.

Now, if an individual teacher has a bias against the philosophy of scientism ... that could come through in his or her lectures ... just like an anti-religious bias could come through in a public school classroom. Teachers are humans and bring their biases to class. In a classical school, you are allowed to respectively disagree and challenge thought ... as long as you are respectful about it. Dialectics are a great way to learn.

The main drawback for a small school ... from a science perspective ... is that they can be poorly funded. Unlike a government school where taxes turn into computers and lab equipment ... private schools (at least the ones that are charging under 10 grand a year) are doing the best they can on a shoestring.

That is a concern of mine.

Anna,

You ask a great question about secularization. I'll dedicate a post to it.

Anna,

You ask a great question about secularization. I'll dedicate a post to it.

Hi Jeff,

I'm curious, are you still using Sonlight with your two children who aren't at Faith Christian? (you have 4 kids, right?)

My husband and I have pretty much the same educational goals for our kids as you, only we are using Sonlight materials (and Latina Christiana). You could probably call our approach a "loose" classical model. I'm curious as to how you made the decision to move from Sonlight to classical Christian school. (hope that's not too personal a question!)

Thanks!

The comments to this entry are closed.