Blogroll

Web Links

Sitemeter


W3 Counter


« Memories From Pinehurst | Main | I Am Going To The U.S. Open! »

June 17, 2005

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c3c869e200d8344e042653ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Earnings From The Da Vinci Code:

Comments

"I am sure many naive souls out there probably think Brown's version of history is the truth. It ain't."

I like alt history, and I think that it can say interestig things about today. Kim Stanley Robinson's Years of Rice and Salt is a brilliant look at today through alt history, for example, and I swear I am going to write the "what if Marx hadn't been an aethist" story :), but I think Brown and his publishers have been far too coy about the fact that the history is largely made up.

And did you like it? I tried it once, and could only get a couple of chapters in. I like thrillers 9Elizabeth George is a favorite of mone, for example) but there is something about his style that just turned me off.

K,

I liked it. I like puzzles ... Da Vinci Code is one puzzle after another. I like Brown's writing style. I felt drawn into the story quickly, and I like lots and lots of short chapters. I was prepared to encounter Brown's bizarre historical perspective, so it did not ruin the book for me.

I am disappointed to hear that Ian McKellan (Gandalf) is playing the role of historian and Grail enthusiast Sir Leigh Teabing. I would have preferred either Anthony Hopkins or Michael Caine in that role.

The scary thing for me is that Time magazine listed Dan Brown as one of the 100 most influential people on the planet. If it is true, that just ain't right. The guy is a novelist writing fiction. In what way should he be influential? Perhaps to influence us to go look at art ... but hopefully, no one finds him an influential historian.

Re: Robinson's alternate history approach.

I picked this up off Amazon's review...

"At the heart of the story are fundamental questions: what is the purpose of life and death? Are we eternal? Do our choices matter? The particular achievement of this book is that it weaves these threads into a story that is both intellectually and emotionally engaging."

That right there is enuf to pique my interest.

Talk about worldview... :-)

At the basis of it all is your fundamental belief about God. Is God sitting back and letting history unfold willy nilly ... or is He actively involved in the history of the world.

I subscribe to the latter perspective. In fact, I believe God is timeless ... which means that He exists in a reality that is eternally now ... simultaneously the past, the present and the future ... a multidimensional view of time.

In other words, from our perspective, time is a line ... from God's perspective, time is a sphere ...

I'll let you wrap your mind around that thot :-)

The comments to this entry are closed.